Bioethics Discussion Blog: "P in a Pod":(Physician Owned Distributorship): Physicians as Investors and Distributors in the Gadget Placed in Your Spine

REMINDER: I AM POSTING A NEW TOPIC ABOUT ONCE A WEEK OR PERHAPS TWICE A WEEK. HOWEVER, IF YOU DON'T FIND A NEW TOPIC POSTED, THERE ARE AS OF MARCH 2013 OVER 900 TOPIC THREADS TO WHICH YOU CAN READ AND WRITE COMMENTS. I WILL BE AWARE OF EACH COMMENTARY AND MAY COME BACK WITH A REPLY.

TO FIND A TOPIC OF INTEREST TO YOU ON THIS BLOG, SIMPLY TYPE IN THE NAME OR WORDS RELATED TO THE TOPIC IN THE FIELD IN THE LEFT HAND SIDE AT TOP OF THE PAGE AND THEN CLICK ON “SEARCH BLOG”. WITH WELL OVER 900 TOPICS, MOST ABOUT GENERAL OR SPECIFIC ETHICAL ISSUES BUT NOT NECESSARILY RELATED TO ANY SPECIFIC DATE OR EVENT, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO FIND WHAT YOU WANT. IF YOU DON’T PLEASE WRITE TO ME ON THE FEEDBACK THREAD OR BY E-MAIL DoktorMo@aol.com

IMPORTANT REQUEST TO ALL WHO COMMENT ON THIS BLOG: ALL COMMENTERS WHO WISH TO SIGN ON AS ANONYMOUS NEVERTHELESS PLEASE SIGN OFF AT THE END OF YOUR COMMENTS WITH A CONSISTENT PSEUDONYM NAME OR SOME INITIALS TO HELP MAINTAIN CONTINUITY AND NOT REQUIRE RESPONDERS TO LOOK UP THE DATE AND TIME OF THE POSTING TO DEFINE WHICH ANONYMOUS SAID WHAT. Thanks. ..Maurice

FEEDBACK,FEEDBACK,FEEDBACK! WRITE YOUR FEEDBACK ABOUT THIS BLOG, WHAT IS GOOD, POOR AND CONSTRUCTIVE SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT TO THIS FEEDBACK THREAD

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

"P in a Pod":(Physician Owned Distributorship): Physicians as Investors and Distributors in the Gadget Placed in Your Spine









If you have chronic back pain and your doctor refers you to an orthopedic surgeon who tells you that he or she can relieve the pain by inserting an appliance in your spine, there is a worry that the surgeon may be offering the surgery mainly for the surgeon's financial interest in that very appliance. 

What is "Physician Owned Distributorship" (POD) and what is its significance to medical practice and the ethical and lawful behavior of the profession?  To get some insight into the POD and its current status, what follows is an explanation as copied from an investigation published by Radio Station KPCC as part of the station's full presentation of the issue.

What is a POD?
A POD is a Physician Owned Distributorship. Under this business model, a doctor is an investor in, and distributor of, the devices or hardware he may put into his patients. Multiple doctors can have a financial interest in one POD.
Is that business arrangement legal?
In and of itself the arrangement is legal, but the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General has concluded that PODs are “inherently suspect under the anti-kickback statute.” It issued fraud alerts about PODs in 2006 and in 2013.
Can I find out if my surgeon is involved in a POD?
Currently, your physician is under no legal obligation to disclose that information. The Sunshine Act, a provision of the Affordable Care Act, does require that each year, certain medical device makers and distributors disclose to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ownership or investment interests held by physicians or their immediate family members. The law requires the Centers to post online the first batch of information it received by September.
Does the ‘Sunshine Act’ require my doctor to inform me that he is involved in a POD?
No. You will have to ask on your own, or search that Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website when it is published. The Centers say the site “will be organized and designed to increase access to and knowledge about these relationships and to provide information to enable consumers to make informed decisions.”

Yes, there are laws preventing physicians from referring their patients to facilities in which they own and invest for laboratory services or procedures. The Federal regulations called Stark (after Pete Stark, congressman who was its primary sponsor) can be summarized as follows: A physician may not make a referral to an entity for the provision of a designated health service (“DHS”) for which Medicare payment may be made (and the entity may not present a claim for services provided as a result of such a referral) if the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship with the entity unless either the referral or the financial relationship is “excepted” from the statute’s coverage.  To read more about Stark regulations, here is the link to a paper by Homchick and Looney which explains its current status.


Please read the excellent KPCC article about this unsettled and unsettling issue and then return back here and write what you would you think about Physician Owned Distributorship and its implications regarding providing the least expensive but the best in medical care.  Balancing the right of private investment by any person versus the need for unbiased decision-making and care by your physician, how do you size up POD, ethically, legally and if you were the patient with that back pain and were told "I have just the operation that can fix it"? ..Maurice.

Graphic: From Google Images and modified by me with ArtRage and Picasa3.


3 Comments:

At Wednesday, June 18, 2014 4:55:00 PM, Blogger Maurice Bernstein, M.D. said...

My question and concern is how can a physician remain impartial with the use of a product when the physician is personally invested in the sale and distribution of a product and whose sale and distribution will be of financial advantage to the doctor?

Or, perhaps, one could answer that the physician is NOT impartial since his or her investigation of the clinical value of the product clearly supports its use. This would mean that impartiality of the product is not a essential or ethical necessity to protect as part of clinical decision making, regardless of any self-interest. ..Maurice.

 
At Saturday, July 26, 2014 3:16:00 PM, Blogger A. Banterings said...

It was very common (at least here in the NE/midatlantic US for the "occupational" (workers' compensation) physicians to have a financial interest in a occupational/physical rehab center.

One reason is that they recommend 4 weeks of rehab before employee returns to work. All employees agree that a one month vacation is best before returning to work.

I believe that this trend is dropping off.

How many hospital systems have their lab, radiology, rehab, etc. as a separate corporation. (Some for profit, when the hospital itself is nonprofit.)

To "drive" the patients there they don't write a paper script, they just say "it's in the system." Patients don't realize that they are separate and depending on the labs, imaging, etc. there can be different copays.

How is this any different?

--Banterings

 
At Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:13:00 PM, Blogger Maurice Bernstein, M.D. said...

How about the more general question?:Does anyone think that a doctor's own private interests should ever affect the treatment of a patient? Such as scheduling a C-section on a date to accommodate the scheduling of a ob-gyn's vacation period? ..Maurice.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home